I'm Jeff George, and I'm running for the US House of Representatives for the 14th District of Florida in 2008.

Open campaigning for the sake of Transparency, Integrity, and Accountability, how crazy is that?

Laws not Walls

One of the greatest strengths of America is the ideal of the great melding pot that turned a collection of immigrants from around the world into a nation of Americans. This ideal is currently under threat, not from any one group, but from a confused patchwork of immigration laws and polices, and the understandable alienation and frustration on all sides over the inequities that have resulted.

In Southwest Florida, and all across America, we see the immediate effects of our failed immigration policy. However before we start demanding mass deportations and giant walls across our borders, we need to recognize that the spike in illegal immigration we’ve seen over the past decade isn’t simply to due to an increased supply of illegal workers, but also a greater demand for cheap, illegal labor.  

A combination of bad policies both here in America and in countries such as Mexico that include lopsided trade agreements such as NAFTA, along a lack of enforcement not only along our borders, but also in our factories and worksites have done more to cause the  spike in the number of illegal aliens working in this country than anything else.

We need a consistent national immigration policy that focuses not only on border security but also the enforcement of labor laws that protect the safety and job security of citizens and legal immigrants alike.

We also need to strike a balance between creating an effective deterrence for illegal entry into this country and the practical need to ensure that our growing immigrant communities are fully integrated into American society by creating a legal pathway to citizenship for those deserving, longtime, undocumented residents who are otherwise contributing to this nation. 

The answer to our immigration problem is better laws not more walls.

 

Posted by admin | Filed in Immigration

Counting Your Votes (This Time for Sure!)

It’s not secret that a number of voters in Florida still have concerns about how their votes are counted.

Workers from the Charlotte County Supervisor of Elections Office demonstrate the latest optical scan voting machines at the Candidate forum sponsored by the Charlotte County Chamber of Commerce.

Raw footage of the forum is also availible in our Google Video section.

 

Campaign Update:  Check out today’s News Press story on the candidate financial reports. Those poor Democrats  …literally!

 

Posted by admin | Filed in Election

Quarterly Report Time (Press Release)

INDEPENDENT NEARLY TRIPLES FUNDRAISING FIGURES

Cape Coral’s George draws more backing for U.S. House run

FORT MYERS, July 15, 2008 – Support for a departure from traditional two-party politics is continuing to grow.

U.S. House of Representatives candidate Jeff George reports to the Federal Election Commission raising $9,257 over the past three months, bringing the total for his campaign to $15,151.

“As this campaign progresses we’re gaining more and more support from people who are looking for an alternative to the big-money, special-interest-run business as usual in Washington, D.C.”

The Cape Coral resident, one of four vying for Florida’s 14th Congressional District seat, is gearing up for a busy slate of forums and public gatherings over the next few months designed to help voters get more acquainted with the candidates.

Accessibility to the people of Southwest Florida is a hallmark of the George campaign, which includes an interactive Web site with live video from his Fort Myers headquarters, unedited footage of meetings with organizations and individuals across the district, and weekly chat sessions.

“The job of a Representative is to be the eyes and ears of the people in Congress,” George said.

George, a U.S. Army veteran, is part-owner of a video production company and making his first run for public office. Archived video clips, blog entries and more information about the campaign are available along with the live features at www.jeffgeorgeforcongress.com.

###

Posted by admin | Filed in Election

Debate News Roundup

This weekend there was a nice burst of coverage on the congressional race spurred on by the debate challenges.

WINK News had Congressman Mack defending himself in Rep. Mack: I won’t debate anybody… yet. and they spoke to me as well. (You can also check out the raw video of my interview.)

Fox News featured the story Saunders — Independent in Name Only which included my view on his candidacy as well. (Be sure to watch Fox’s video of the report. You can also take a look at our raw footage of the interview.)

The Fort Myers News Press ran the column Mack snubs Saunders on debate that offered up Betty Parker’s take on viability. (Some of the comments are interesting too.) 

The Cape Coral Daily Breeze ran Saunders proposes candidate debate for District 14 seat; Responses are mixed.

There’s no doubt now, the debates will continue to be issue that won’t go away…

Posted by admin | Filed in Election

Debate! Debate! (Press Release)

GEORGE WANTS DEBATE FOR U.S. HOUSE SEAT

Cape Coral independent says Mack denying voters vital opportunity

FORT MYERS, July 10, 2008 – Congressional candidate Jeff George is ready to debate, even if incumbent Connie Mack is not.

The Cape Coral resident and U.S. Army veteran is joining a growing chorus in calling for a series of public debates this fall involving Mack and all three challengers for the District 14 seat.

“One of my goals since we began this campaign was to make sure that Southwest Florida finally got a chance to see Rep. Mack explain and defend his position in an open forum,” George said.

Fellow independent U.S. House of Representatives hopeful Burt Saunders on Tuesday sent an e-mail to Mack inviting him to participate in a series of town hall meetings or debates that would take place in the two months leading up to the Nov. 4 election.

Jeff Cohen, Mack’s chief of staff, rejected the request in a response sent to the state senator.

“If and when any challenger to Congressman Mack - whether that is you (Senator Saunders) an Independent, Robert Neeld, a Democrat, or Jeff George, an Independent - becomes a viable opponent we will of course consider their request for a debate,” Cohen is quoted as saying in a press release from the Saunders campaign.

George, who is willing to assist any organization in setting up a debate, said Mack is denying his constituents the opportunity they deserve to hear the candidates discuss their views on the issues of utmost importance to Southwest Florida.

“It’s not the job of Connie Mack or Jeff Cohen to determine who is a viable candidate,” George said. “That’s up to the voters to decide, and Congressman Mack needs to realize he’s in office to serve the people of this district, and not the other way around.”

George, part-owner of a video production company, is endeavoring to give the people of Southwest Florida unprecedented access to the inner workings of his campaign.

He has used cameras to provide streaming online video of day-to-day work at his Fort Myers headquarters and document interaction with organizations and individuals across the district.

Those live videos and archived clips of events from the past several months are available on George’s Web site, www.jeffgeorgeforcongress.com.

###

Posted by admin | Filed in Election

Remember the Fourth Amendment?

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Amendment 4 - Search and SeizureThe United States Constitution

 

How personal do you consider the data on your laptop, cellphone, or PDA to be? Do you keep confidential business, medical, or customer information on these devices? Do you think it’s reasonable to surrender this data every time you cross the border?

According to an article published today in the CS Monitor:

“For the past 18 months, immigration officials at border entries have been searching and seizing some citizens’ laptops, cellphones, and BlackBerry devices when they return from international trips.

In some cases, the officers go through the files while the traveler is standing there. In others, they take the device for several hours and download the hard drive’s content. After that, it’s unclear what happens to the data.

The Department of Homeland Security contends these searches and seizures of electronic files are vital to detecting terrorists and child pornographers. It also says it has the constitutional authority to do them without a warrant or probable cause.”

While I understand that we need make sure that law enforcement has all the tools available to protect our citizens, I think we really need to stop and consider why the founders considered it necessary to protect our rights against unreasonable search and seizure, and how we define that in the 21st century.

No doubt there are circumstances in which searching an individuals laptop is warranted, but the key word here is warrant, as in probable cause. As I understand the Constitution, just traveling across the border is not probable cause for the government to search and copy what may be a citizen’s most vital personal and and professional data, and than do who knows what with it.

As the recent votes in the house and senate on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (which Rep. Connie Mack supported) seem to demonstrate, our representatives in Congress have apparently forgotten all about the Fourth Amendment, and feel that the laws that protect you and I don’t necessarily apply to the president or the most powerful telecom corperations whenever these laws become inconvenient.

What do you think the odds are that if a group of concerned citizens seized our congressman’s personal laptop and made copies of his hard drive, they’d get retroactive immunity? What would happen if we demanded to take a look at the Vice President’s cell phone?

Now I’m not suggesting anyone should attempt this, but I do think it’s worth pondering why this government seems to feel that it has no accountability to the people they serve when it comes to their own secrets, but that we the people have no right to our own personal privacy.  It’s also worth asking exactly who is protecting who here, and from what?

It’s time for the people to take back our government. It’s time for a change…

Posted by admin | Filed in The Constitution

Hipster Voting Guide

This morning on The Onion AV Club I read about an interesting list-making challenge that’s making the rounds on blogs to pick an album for every year you’ve been alive.  I decided it might be fun to do here for those voters around my age who are hip enough to judge a candidate based purely on his/her musical tastes.

I set a couple of ground rules for myself. The first was that I had to actually own the album (there’s only one exception), and the second was that even though I tried to list what I was listening to around the year in question, the choices have to be something I could still listen to and enjoy today. I also tried to maintain some variety, but a few favorite bands got multiple listings

While I’m not sure my choices are hip enough for the hipsters, in the words of Marge Simpson “And that’s what makes me cool—not caring, right?”

 

1968  The White Album - The Beatles

1969  Let It Bleed - The Rolling Stones (I own it on vinyl but not CD.)

1970  LA Woman - The Doors

1971  Hunky Dory - David Bowie

1972  Close to the Edge - Yes

1973  Dark Side of the Moon - Pink Floyd

1974  Pretzel Logic - Steely Dan (I don’t actually own any albums from 1974 which seems to have been a terrible year for music, but this was a good album, and I have a few tracks from it here and there.)

1975  Wish You Were Here - Pink Floyd

1976  2112 - Rush

1977  Animals - Pink Floyd

1978  Hemispheres - Rush

1979  The Wall - Pink Floyd

1980  Back In Black - AC/DC

1981  Ghost In the Machine - The Police

1982  Pornography - The Cure

1983  War - U2

1984  Stop Making Sense - Talking Heads

1985  Songs from the Big Chair - Tears for Fears

1986  The Queen is Dead  - The Smiths

1987  Music for the Masses  - Depeche Mode

1988  Green - REM

1989  Passion - Peter Gabriel

1990  Goodbye Jumbo - World Party (A very close second would be Ritual De Lo Habitual by Jane’s Addiction.)

1991  Nevermind - Nirvana (Again a real toss-up here with this and Achtung Baby by U2)

1992  Singles Soundtrack - Various (I know picking a soundtrack is sort of cheating, but this also has two of my favorite Pearl Jam songs.)

1993  Siamese Dreams - Smashing Pumpkins

1994  Weezer  -Weezer

1995  Garbage - Garbage

1996  Sublime - Sublime

1997  OK Computer - Radiohead (followed closely by Homework by Daft Punk)

1998  You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby - Fat Boy Slim

1999  The Fragile - Nine Inch Nails

2000 Kid A - Radiohead (This was a real toss-up between this and Mer de Noms by A Perfect Circle.)

2001  Lateralus - Tool

2002  A Rush of Blood to the Head - Coldplay

2003  Thirteenth Step - A Perfect Circle

2004  Hot Fuss - The Killers

2005  Demon Days - Gorillaz

2006  The Crane Wife - The Decemberists

2007  In Rainbows - Radiohead

2008  No favorite yet…

Posted by admin | Filed in Personal

The Bonnie Situation

I’m so excited! This week, I got my first anonymous attack e-mail:

> \”Open campaigning for the sake of Transparency, Integrity, and Accountability\”
> So does this mean the public gets to learn about a certain Ms. Harper?

When I read that, I felt just like Navin Johnson with the new phone book. “I’m somebody now!” I feel like a real candidate. “Things are gonna start happening to me now…”

I’ve never made any secret of the fact that I’ve made my share of mistakes, the incident our anonymous friend is referring should probably be classified as my biggie: the equivalent of my own personal Iraq war.

I’ve been planning to address this for a while, and now seems as good a time as any, so (with a nod to Quentin Tarantino), let’s discuss what someone seems to think is the political equivalent of having a car covered with Marvin’s brains in my garage, The Bonnie Situation.

Let’s start with the facts. First of all, here is the full transcript of Harper, Bonnie Anne Pettioner vs George, Jeffrey Respondent, that sums up everything that preceded it in the actual word of those involved.

Also, here are links to the newspaper article and the book A StoryBook referenced in the transcript.

Instead of trying to rehash the long since past details of the situation, I think it would be better express what I carry with me today from the experience. The bottom line is my behavior was a mistake, and I regret any hurt feelings or emotional harm my actions caused anyone involved. 

Now if that sounds like a too pat, typical, mea culpa, let me elaborate a bit.  

Looking back on it, I can see that I was operating from the point where passion, naivety, and idealism intersect with obsession, insensitivity, and selfishness. The whole world, including the person I was most trying to impress, was telling me that my interest in her was unrequited (to say the least!) and my approach to the whole situation was wrong, but I was too self-involved to really hear what they had to say.

I felt that because of the appalling way the first two hearings were conducted I was the victim of some gross injustice, despite the fact that I myself refused the sensible advise to seek legal counsel. I guess I was trying to make some sort of foolish Gandhi-esque stand to prove the purity of my intentions when instead I should’ve just been respectful of both the legal process and the obvious message I was being sent.

When I refer to this as “my own personal Iraq war” I’m not exactly kidding. I don’t mean this in the sense that I feel like I experienced combat, but rather that I have a sincere, first-hand appreciation of the place President Bush was in mentally when he made the decision to invade Iraq!

I also understand the process of grief that those Americans who initially supported the invasion and their inability now to admit that it was mistake. I know from my own experience that this can only come in time.

Now, as to how this experience reflects on my commitment to transparency, integrity, and accountability: again, I can only look back now and reflect on the mistakes I made.

In hindsight, I felt that I was in awkward predicament almost from the beginning, and was perhaps too honest in the way I presented myself and called attention to feelings and behavior that probably would’ve been better left unsaid. However, that wasn’t my real mistake in this regard.

The biggest mistake I made were that I said I would stay away, but I always found some convenient excuse to circumvent that promise. While the number of times I encountered Bonnie were just a few incidents spread out over five years or so, the problem was I couldn’t put my own feelings in to perspective with the reality of the actual situation.

In my mind, I felt that the case should’ve never gone to court in the first place, and that I was essentially forced to agree to the initial injunction under the threat of imprisonment. When I broke that injunction, I not only thought enough time had passed that we could both look back on the situation with some perspective, I was trying to show that the reason I had stayed away for that time was because I thought I was being respectful of her feelings, and not afraid of the consequences of the law. I realize now not only that my perspective still wasn’t objective at that time, but also how foolish the stand I thought  I was making really was.

Altough I’m still not exactly sure I deserved to go to jail for two and a half weeks because of it, the bottom line is I made my choice, it was the wrong choice, and I suffered the consequences for it.

All I can do now, is try to be as honest about everything that happened as I can be, and do my best to learn from the experience. On the one hand, I gained some real personal perspective on the legal process, and became a bit more aware of some of the actual injustices (compared to what I went through) that do occur in the system.

But more importantly, I learned the value of respect for the rule of law, not so much because of the personal consequences, but because of the consequences to us a as a society. I also learned that no matter how sensitive we might think we are, if we’re only being sensitive to our own feelings, that’s not at all the same as being sensitive to the feelings of others. I learned this the hard way, and I hope that somehow I can take that experience and use it for some good.

Now, in regard to my campaign for office I ‘d like for this to lay “The Bonnie Situation” to rest once and for all, but I’m sure in the minds of some people, particularly those who are looking for an excuse for political or personal gain, it won’t. 

All I can say is that if you think I learned my lesson, I sincerely appreciate your compassion and your understanding.  And, if I didn’t really learn anything, than I trust your judgement as to my fitness for office will truly be reflected in your vote.

If you think I’m some sort of monster because of my past, than you might also like to know that not too long after the hearing I also filed personal bankruptcy. And, a couple of years later I was arrested (but not convicted) for a DUI. Have fun writing those attack ads!

Now lets move on, shall we…

Posted by admin | Filed in Personal

Happy 4th of July!

I hope everyone enjoys their Independence Day this year!

Posted by admin | Filed in Holiday

Remembering George Carlin

“The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they’re an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They’ve got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying – lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.

But I’ll tell you what they don’t want. They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. “

George Carlin

 

Sometimes it’s the voice that no one is meant to take seriously that we need give the most serious consideration. And, if someone can inspire us to laugh and to do better at the same time, that, my friends, is a voice we need to remember.

And in honor of the memory of George Carlin, I’ll do my best to piss off his critics by encouraging a little more critical thinking, and maybe by using the other six words too…

Posted by admin | Filed in Humor